Lakshmikanthan vs Thasildhar Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR — 264/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or-7, R-1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 11th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY060015262024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
654/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
264/2024
Registration Date
16-10-2024
Court
Sub Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmikanthan
Adv. Thiru. R. VENUGOPALAN
Respondent(s)
Thasildhar Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR
District Collector
Adv. Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Lakshmiakanthan), ordering the Revenue Department to correct government land records (Patta, Chitta, Adangal, and map) to reflect the plaintiff's mother's original purchase deed dated 14.05.1960, which specified the property extent as 0.19 cents. The court found that the plaintiff adequately proved through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the land records incorrectly showed reduced measurements, and directed the authorities to issue corrected documents in the plaintiff's name with the correct area details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Lakshmiakanthan), ordering the Revenue Department to correct government land records (Patta, Chitta, Adangal, and map) to reflect the plaintiff's mother's original purchase deed dated 14.05.1960, which specified the property extent as 0.19 cents. The court found that the plaintiff adequately proved through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the land records incorrectly showed reduced measurements, and directed the authorities to issue corrected documents in the plaintiff's name with the correct area details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts