Lakshmikanthan vs Thasildhar Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR — 264/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or-7, R-1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY060015262024

Filing Number

654/2024

Filing Date

14-Oct-2024

Registration No

264/2024

Registration Date

16-Oct-2024

Court

Sub Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or-7, R-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmikanthan

    Adv. Thiru. R. VENUGOPALAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thasildhar Advocate - Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR

  2. 2.District Collector

    Adv. Thiru. S. MUTHUKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Lakshmiakanthan), ordering the Revenue Department to correct government land records (Patta, Chitta, Adangal, and map) to reflect the plaintiff's mother's original purchase deed dated 14.05.1960, which specified the property extent as 0.19 cents. The court found that the plaintiff adequately proved through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the land records incorrectly showed reduced measurements, and directed the authorities to issue corrected documents in the plaintiff's name with the correct area details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  16. 05-Jan-2026

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  18. 12-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  21. 03-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  22. 29-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  23. 14-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  24. 03-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  25. 03-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  27. 16-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 14-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff (Lakshmiakanthan), ordering the Revenue Department to correct government land records (Patta, Chitta, Adangal, and map) to reflect the plaintiff's mother's original purchase deed dated 14.05.1960, which specified the property extent as 0.19 cents. The court found that the plaintiff adequately proved through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the land records incorrectly showed reduced measurements, and directed the authorities to issue corrected documents in the plaintiff's name with the correct area details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case