State Bank of Indina Ref. By its Branch Manager, Thiruvengadu Branch vs Priyanka — 199/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or-7, R1, 2 Or-34, R-1, 2. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY060012402024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
524/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
199/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of Indina Ref. By its Branch Manager, Thiruvengadu Branch
Adv. R.Ravichandaran
Respondent(s)
Priyanka
Jayanthi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Sirkali decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendants Priyanka and Jayanthi for recovery of an education loan. The court directed the defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 2,45,233/- with 6% interest per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 2,02,208/- from the date of plaint until realization, plus costs. Since the defendants failed to contest the suit despite being served summons, the court accepted the bank's evidence, including signed loan documents and revival letters acknowledging the debt, and drew adverse inferences against the defendants' non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Sirkali decreed the suit filed by State Bank of India against defendants Priyanka and Jayanthi for recovery of an education loan. The court directed the defendants to jointly and severally pay Rs. 2,45,233/- with 6% interest per annum on the principal amount of Rs. 2,02,208/- from the date of plaint until realization, plus costs. Since the defendants failed to contest the suit despite being served summons, the court accepted the bank's evidence, including signed loan documents and revival letters acknowledging the debt, and drew adverse inferences against the defendants' non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts