Inspector of Police Thiruvenkadu PS vs ELAKKIYARAJ — 29/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b),386,506(ii),307. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY060008582024

Filing Number

566/2024

Filing Date

17-Apr-2024

Registration No

29/2024

Registration Date

22-Apr-2024

Court

Sub Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

Thiruvenkadu Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b),386,506(ii),307

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Thiruvenkadu PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Thiru.R.SEYON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ELAKKIYARAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali acquitted the accused Ikkiyaraj of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 386, 506(ii), 307 and Arms Act sections 25(1)(b), 27(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that government witness statements were contradictory and unreliable, with the complainant himself giving hostile testimony, while the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged assault and robbery case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  12. 16-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  15. 23-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  17. 23-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  21. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  28. 07-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  29. 15-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  30. 25-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  31. 10-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  32. 22-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  33. 22-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 17-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali acquitted the accused Ikkiyaraj of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 386, 506(ii), 307 and Arms Act sections 25(1)(b), 27(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that government witness statements were contradictory and unreliable, with the complainant himself giving hostile testimony, while the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged assault and robbery case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case