Inspector of Police Thiruvenkadu PS vs ELAKKIYARAJ — 29/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b),386,506(ii),307. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMY060008582024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
566/2024
Filing Date
17-04-2024
Registration No
29/2024
Registration Date
22-04-2024
Court
Sub Court, Sirkali
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
219
Police Station
Thiruvenkadu Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Thiruvenkadu PS (Police Station)
Adv. Thiru.R.SEYON
Respondent(s)
ELAKKIYARAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali acquitted the accused Ikkiyaraj of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 386, 506(ii), 307 and Arms Act sections 25(1)(b), 27(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that government witness statements were contradictory and unreliable, with the complainant himself giving hostile testimony, while the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged assault and robbery case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali acquitted the accused Ikkiyaraj of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 386, 506(ii), 307 and Arms Act sections 25(1)(b), 27(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that government witness statements were contradictory and unreliable, with the complainant himself giving hostile testimony, while the investigating officer's evidence was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged assault and robbery case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts