SADAKOBAN vs VIJAYALAKSHMI — 2/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR41R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNMY060002782025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

292/2025

Filing Date

02-06-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

09-06-2025

Court

Sub Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR41R1
IA/1/2026 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section SADAKOBANVIJAYALAKSHMI

Petitioner(s)

SADAKOBAN

Adv. Thiru. A. RAMKUMAR

Respondent(s)

VIJAYALAKSHMI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

07-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Judgement

13-03-2026

Judgement

10-03-2026

List / Special List

02-03-2026

List / Special List

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Sirkali Subordinate Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the lower court's judgment dated February 13, 2025. The court ruled that a settlement deed dated August 10, 1979, validly transferred land ownership to the respondent, and found that the respondent had proven her claim to declaratory and possessory reliefs through credible evidence and witnesses. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the settlement deed was invalid because the respondent never physically took possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sirkali Subordinate Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the lower court's judgment dated February 13, 2025. The court ruled that a settlement deed dated August 10, 1979, validly transferred land ownership to the respondent, and found that the respondent had proven her claim to declaratory and possessory reliefs through credible evidence and witnesses. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the settlement deed was invalid because the respondent never physically took possession of the land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sirkali All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case