Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu vs ELAKKIYARAJ — 98/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b),352,307,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY060002152024

Filing Number

159/2023

Filing Date

04-Nov-2023

Registration No

98/2023

Registration Date

04-Nov-2023

Court

Sub Court, Sirkali

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

Thiruvenkadu Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b),352,307,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu

    Adv. Thiru.R.SEYON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ELAKKIYARAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali, acquitted the accused Ikiyaraj of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, 307, and 506(2) on April 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony contradicted the government's case and eyewitnesses could not corroborate the alleged incident of assault with scissors during a dispute over gold redemption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  15. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  18. 14-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  21. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  24. 01-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  26. 23-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  27. 14-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  28. 24-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  29. 10-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  30. 21-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  31. 26-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  32. 27-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  33. 06-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  34. 22-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  35. 27-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  36. 18-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  37. 12-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  38. 28-Feb-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  39. 13-Feb-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Subordinate Judge, Sirkali

  40. 03-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 04-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Assistant Sessions Court, Sirkali, acquitted the accused Ikiyaraj of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 352, 307, and 506(2) on April 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony contradicted the government's case and eyewitnesses could not corroborate the alleged incident of assault with scissors during a dispute over gold redemption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case