BABU vs VENKATESAN — 430/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNMY030025002024

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1462/2024

Filing Date

19-12-2024

Registration No

430/2024

Registration Date

19-12-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

BABU

Adv. THIRU. S. NITHINBABU

GAJALAKSHMI

SREE RANJANI REP. BY HER FATHER BABU

Respondent(s)

VENKATESAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

06-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Enquiry

17-02-2026

Enquiry

02-02-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

02-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No.430/2024 Court: Principal District Court, Tiladhuthurai Date: 02.02.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of the first petitioner's witness (Babu, age 49) in this motor vehicle accident compensation petition. Multiple documentary evidence was admitted, including FIR report, alteration report, RC books of both vehicles (TN 82B 7033 and TN 82C 1666), post-mortem certificate, death certificate, heirship certificate, and bank account details of both parties. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel's advocate was adjourned, and the witness testimony was recorded and confirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: MCOP. No.430/2024 Court: Principal District Court, Tiladhuthurai Date: 02.02.2026 The court recorded the examination-in-chief of the first petitioner's witness (Babu, age 49) in this motor vehicle accident compensation petition. Multiple documentary evidence was admitted, including FIR report, alteration report, RC books of both vehicles (TN 82B 7033 and TN 82C 1666), post-mortem certificate, death certificate, heirship certificate, and bank account details of both parties. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel's advocate was adjourned, and the witness testimony was recorded and confirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case