Rani vs K. Premkumar — 282/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNMY030019072024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1040/2024
Filing Date
02-09-2024
Registration No
282/2024
Registration Date
02-09-2024
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rani
Adv. Thiru P.SURESHKUMAR
R. Usha Nandhini
R. Rameshkumar
E. Umarani
Respondent(s)
K. Premkumar
The Divisional Manager, The Sriram Gen. In. Company
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 11-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 02-01-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
This is a motor vehicle insurance claim case arising from a fatal accident. The petitioners (Rani, R. Usha Nandhini, and R. Rameshkumar) claimed compensation from the second respondent (Sriram General Insurance Company) for the death of a 80-year-old family member in a motorcycle accident. The court accepted testimony from the petitioner and supporting witnesses, finding the deceased contributory negligence and insurance policy violations by the driver. The court ordered the insurance company to pay compensation along with applicable interest, rejecting the insurer's defense that it was not liable due to policy breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a motor vehicle insurance claim case arising from a fatal accident. The petitioners (Rani, R. Usha Nandhini, and R. Rameshkumar) claimed compensation from the second respondent (Sriram General Insurance Company) for the death of a 80-year-old family member in a motorcycle accident. The court accepted testimony from the petitioner and supporting witnesses, finding the deceased contributory negligence and insurance policy violations by the driver. The court ordered the insurance company to pay compensation along with applicable interest, rejecting the insurer's defense that it was not liable due to policy breach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts