Murugammal vs Aravindh — 174/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNMY030010472024

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2024

Filing Number

565/2024

Filing Date

20-06-2024

Registration No

174/2024

Registration Date

20-06-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Murugammal

Adv. Sankaranarayanan Srinivasan

Respondent(s)

Aravindh

The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co Ltd,

Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

21-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

18-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

In Case MCOP No. 174/2024, the Principal District Court at Mayiladuthurai heard the testimony of petitioner Murugammal on 19.11.2025. Murugammal, age 60, testified regarding a motor vehicle accident where she sustained injuries including a fractured hip requiring surgical intervention with plate insertion. The court examined her cross-examination by the respondent's counsel concerning the accident circumstances, vehicle details, and injury claims. The court recorded her sworn testimony and admitted documentary evidence presented during proceedings. The case remains under adjudication for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Case MCOP No. 174/2024, the Principal District Court at Mayiladuthurai heard the testimony of petitioner Murugammal on 19.11.2025. Murugammal, age 60, testified regarding a motor vehicle accident where she sustained injuries including a fractured hip requiring surgical intervention with plate insertion. The court examined her cross-examination by the respondent's counsel concerning the accident circumstances, vehicle details, and injury claims. The court recorded her sworn testimony and admitted documentary evidence presented during proceedings. The case remains under adjudication for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case