N. NAGARAJAN vs T. RAMALINGAM — 171/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 140 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNMY030010362023

Filing Number

950/2023

Filing Date

31-Jul-2023

Registration No

171/2023

Registration Date

08-Aug-2023

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 140 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N. NAGARAJAN

    Adv. JAYARANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T. RAMALINGAM

  2. 2.The Branch Manager

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    The court recorded the testimony of a witness (Senior Manager at TATA AIG General Insurance Company) in case MCOP No. 171/2023 dated 08.04.2026 regarding a vehicle accident that occurred on 21.05.2023. The witness confirmed that the accident was real, that the first respondent's two-wheeler (TN 82 V 8170) was insured with their company, and that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident, establishing the insurance company's liability for damages rather than the second respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  15. 03-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  17. 13-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  18. 02-Sep-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Sub Judge

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  20. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  21. 14-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  23. 18-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  24. 21-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  25. 25-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  26. 21-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  27. 28-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  28. 21-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Sub Judge

  29. 10-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  30. 20-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  31. 07-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  32. 29-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  33. 14-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  34. 11-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  35. 01-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  36. 10-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  37. 10-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  38. 13-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  39. 08-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  40. 06-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  41. 19-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 31-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court recorded the testimony of a witness (Senior Manager at TATA AIG General Insurance Company) in case MCOP No. 171/2023 dated 08.04.2026 regarding a vehicle accident that occurred on 21.05.2023. The witness confirmed that the accident was real, that the first respondent's two-wheeler (TN 82 V 8170) was insured with their company, and that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident, establishing the insurance company's liability for damages rather than the second respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case