SENTHILMURUGAN vs ELANTHAMIZH — 141/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 142,166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNMY030006682024

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

432/2024

Filing Date

15-11-2022

Registration No

141/2024

Registration Date

30-04-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 142,166

Petitioner(s)

SENTHILMURUGAN

Adv. Thiru T. NANMARAN

Respondent(s)

ELANTHAMIZH

ILANTAMIL

THE BRANCH MANAGER, RELAINCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

09-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

18-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary Case Number: MCOP.No.141/2024 Court: Principal District Court, Tilaipadi Date: 09.04.2026 Outcome: The witness (PW1) was examined and his testimony recorded. During cross-examination by the second defendant, the witness's credibility was substantially challenged on multiple grounds, including contradictions regarding the accident circumstances, driver's license and insurance validity, medical treatment claims, and insurance claim details. The court found no negligence or rash driving by the second defendant and held that no relief should be granted against him in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case Number: MCOP.No.141/2024 Court: Principal District Court, Tilaipadi Date: 09.04.2026 Outcome: The witness (PW1) was examined and his testimony recorded. During cross-examination by the second defendant, the witness's credibility was substantially challenged on multiple grounds, including contradictions regarding the accident circumstances, driver's license and insurance validity, medical treatment claims, and insurance claim details. The court found no negligence or rash driving by the second defendant and held that no relief should be granted against him in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case