State Bank of India Mayiladuthurai Branch rep by its Manager vs S.VINAYAGAMOORTHI — 129/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY030006092025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

604/2025

Filing Date

30-06-2025

Registration No

129/2025

Registration Date

03-07-2025

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

State Bank of India Mayiladuthurai Branch rep by its Manager

Adv. Thiru.J.PARI

Respondent(s)

S.VINAYAGAMOORTHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

23-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Principal District Court of Tirupati ruled in favor of Bharath State Bank (plaintiff) against S. Vinayakamurthy (defendant) in a personal loan recovery case. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 3,16,682 (the outstanding loan amount as of April 2, 2025) plus 9% interest from the loan date and 6% interest from the judgment date, as the defendant failed to appear in court and the bank's documentary evidence (loan application, agreement, account statement) substantiated the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District Court of Tirupati ruled in favor of Bharath State Bank (plaintiff) against S. Vinayakamurthy (defendant) in a personal loan recovery case. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 3,16,682 (the outstanding loan amount as of April 2, 2025) plus 9% interest from the loan date and 6% interest from the judgment date, as the defendant failed to appear in court and the bank's documentary evidence (loan application, agreement, account statement) substantiated the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case