R.MANOKARAN vs E.AMUTHA — 89/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY030004772025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
468/2025
Filing Date
02-06-2025
Registration No
89/2025
Registration Date
05-06-2025
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.MANOKARAN
Adv. Thiru.T.VIJAYAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
E.AMUTHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District Court in Tiruppattur, Tamil Nadu, ordered the defendant E. Amudha to repay the plaintiff R. Monikaaran a loan of ₹1,22,000 (comprising ₹1,00,000 principal plus accrued interest at 12% p.a.) along with additional interest at 9% per annum from judgment date and 6% thereafter until payment. The court found that the defendant had borrowed ₹1,00,000 on July 26, 2023, acknowledged the debt through a promissory note, but deliberately delayed repayment despite a legal notice on April 29, 2025, and failed to appear in court to contest the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal District Court in Tiruppattur, Tamil Nadu, ordered the defendant E. Amudha to repay the plaintiff R. Monikaaran a loan of ₹1,22,000 (comprising ₹1,00,000 principal plus accrued interest at 12% p.a.) along with additional interest at 9% per annum from judgment date and 6% thereafter until payment. The court found that the defendant had borrowed ₹1,00,000 on July 26, 2023, acknowledged the debt through a promissory note, but deliberately delayed repayment despite a legal notice on April 29, 2025, and failed to appear in court to contest the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts