SUJITHA vs T.MURALI Advocate - Thiru. J. JAYASEELAN — 50/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNMY030004132024

Filing Number

249/2024

Filing Date

21-Mar-2024

Registration No

50/2024

Registration Date

28-Mar-2024

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJITHA

    Adv. Thiru. K.MOHANASUNDARAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.MURALI Advocate - Thiru. J. JAYASEELAN

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary HMOP. No.50/2024 | District Court, Villupuram | Date: 11.02.2026 The witness (61-year-old male) testified in court and his statement was recorded and read back to him. The witness affirmed the accuracy of his recorded statement. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel's advocate was postponed/deferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  15. 29-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  17. 20-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  18. 09-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Sub Judge

  19. 07-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  20. 16-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  21. 05-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal Sub Judge

  22. 01-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  23. 18-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  24. 12-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  25. 27-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  26. 10-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  27. 08-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  28. 02-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  29. 13-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  30. 30-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  31. 25-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  32. 11-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal Sub Judge

  33. 23-Nov-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  34. 15-Nov-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  35. 28-Oct-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  36. 24-Oct-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  37. 16-Oct-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  38. 30-Sep-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  39. 29-Aug-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Sub Judge

  40. 27-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  41. 16-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  42. 26-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  43. 14-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Principal Sub Judge

  44. 26-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Sub Judge

  45. 28-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 21-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary HMOP. No.50/2024 | District Court, Villupuram | Date: 11.02.2026 The witness (61-year-old male) testified in court and his statement was recorded and read back to him. The witness affirmed the accuracy of his recorded statement. Cross-examination by the opposing counsel's advocate was postponed/deferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case