Inspector of Police, Kuthlam P.S vs Karthikeyan — 55/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307, 506(ii). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMY030003812022
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
14/2022
Filing Date
25-03-2022
Registration No
55/2022
Registration Date
25-03-2022
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
938
Police Station
Kuthalam Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Kuthlam P.S
Adv. Thiru.P.SIVADOSS
Respondent(s)
Karthikeyan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness testimony records from Case 55/2022 dated 24.06.2025 from the Principal Assistant Court, Vilaathuthurai. The case involves the Inspector of Police, Kuthlam P.S. (petitioner) versus Karthikeyan (respondent). The court records three witness statements describing an alleged violent incident on 09.06.2020 involving multiple assailants armed with weapons. Witnesses testified about injuries sustained and identification of accused persons. The court recorded their testimonies, which were transcribed, read back to witnesses for confirmation, and acknowledged as accurate by the witnesses themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness testimony records from Case 55/2022 dated 24.06.2025 from the Principal Assistant Court, Vilaathuthurai. The case involves the Inspector of Police, Kuthlam P.S. (petitioner) versus Karthikeyan (respondent). The court records three witness statements describing an alleged violent incident on 09.06.2020 involving multiple assailants armed with weapons. Witnesses testified about injuries sustained and identification of accused persons. The court recorded their testimonies, which were transcribed, read back to witnesses for confirmation, and acknowledged as accurate by the witnesses themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts