Santhosh vs TNSTC, VEZHUPURAM — 25/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNMY030003422023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
334/2023
Filing Date
27-01-2023
Registration No
25/2023
Registration Date
20-03-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santhosh
Adv. Thiru. P.ANBUROSE
Respondent(s)
TNSTC, VEZHUPURAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 25/2023 - Santhosh v. TNSTC, Vezhupuram This case involves a medical negligence claim where 24-year-old Santhosh sought treatment for leg pain and swelling on 07.02.2026. Dr. Sridhar testified that X-rays revealed a fracture with a plate and screw already implanted; he recommended surgical removal at an estimated cost of ₹50,000. The court examined the doctor's testimony and medical records (marked as exhibits). The case proceeded with cross-examination of the respondent's representative regarding the accident circumstances and the timing of treatment, with the court confirming the witness statement through transcript review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 25/2023 - Santhosh v. TNSTC, Vezhupuram This case involves a medical negligence claim where 24-year-old Santhosh sought treatment for leg pain and swelling on 07.02.2026. Dr. Sridhar testified that X-rays revealed a fracture with a plate and screw already implanted; he recommended surgical removal at an estimated cost of ₹50,000. The court examined the doctor's testimony and medical records (marked as exhibits). The case proceeded with cross-examination of the respondent's representative regarding the accident circumstances and the timing of treatment, with the court confirming the witness statement through transcript review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts