The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai vs Rithish — 24/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,324,326,307,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMY030002392023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2023
Filing Date
23-02-2023
Registration No
24/2023
Registration Date
01-03-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
1481
Police Station
Mayiladuthurai
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai
Adv. Thiru.P.SIVADOSS
Respondent(s)
Rithish
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both defendants (A1 and A2) of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, 307 (for A1) and 294(b), 324 (for A2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key issues included contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding hospitalization details, inconsistencies between the hospital record and statements about the incident timing, and witnesses (W2, W3, W4) who testified for the prosecution being found unreliable. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both defendants (A1 and A2) of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, 307 (for A1) and 294(b), 324 (for A2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key issues included contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding hospitalization details, inconsistencies between the hospital record and statements about the incident timing, and witnesses (W2, W3, W4) who testified for the prosecution being found unreliable. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts