The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai vs Rithish — 24/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,324,326,307,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY030002392023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2023

Filing Date

23-02-2023

Registration No

24/2023

Registration Date

01-03-2023

Court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

1481

Police Station

Mayiladuthurai

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294,324,326,307,
MP/6/2025 Classification : Advance petition Section RithishThe Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai

Adv. Thiru.P.SIVADOSS

Respondent(s)

Rithish

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both defendants (A1 and A2) of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, 307 (for A1) and 294(b), 324 (for A2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key issues included contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding hospitalization details, inconsistencies between the hospital record and statements about the incident timing, and witnesses (W2, W3, W4) who testified for the prosecution being found unreliable. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both defendants (A1 and A2) of all charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, 307 (for A1) and 294(b), 324 (for A2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key issues included contradictions in the complainant's testimony regarding hospitalization details, inconsistencies between the hospital record and statements about the incident timing, and witnesses (W2, W3, W4) who testified for the prosecution being found unreliable. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused and ordered their release under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case