FATHIMA BEEVI vs MOHAMED ASAN — 23/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY030001122023
Filing Number
109/2023
Filing Date
12-Jan-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
27-Jan-2023
Court
Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FATHIMA BEEVI
Adv. Thiru.K.BALAMURUGAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAMED ASAN
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Dec-2024
Issue of Process
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
19-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Arguments
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Steps
Principal Sub Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2024
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jan-2024
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Appearance
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
15-Nov-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
24-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
12-Jun-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 23/2023 (Fathima Beevi v. Mohamed Asan) In this Original Suit (OS No. 23/2023) dated 05.04.2023, the petitioner Fathima Beevi filed against respondent Mohamed Asan. The court heard witness testimony and examined documentary evidence, including a copy of a registered deed produced by the defendant. The court directed that judgment be rendered based on the evidence and arguments presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal Sub Judge
-
03-Mar-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2023
Batta
Principal Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2023
Case Summary: 23/2023 (Fathima Beevi v. Mohamed Asan) In this Original Suit (OS No. 23/2023) dated 05.04.2023, the petitioner Fathima Beevi filed against respondent Mohamed Asan. The court heard witness testimony and examined documentary evidence, including a copy of a registered deed produced by the defendant. The court directed that judgment be rendered based on the evidence and arguments presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts