Inspector of Police, PagasalaiPS vs BALAKUMARAN — 772/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294b),427,506(I). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMY020058772024
e-Filing Number
22-10-2024
Filing Number
5835/2024
Filing Date
25-Oct-2024
Registration No
772/2024
Registration Date
25-Oct-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.2
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Pagasalai Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, PagasalaiPS
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALAKUMARAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Mayiladuthurai acquitted Balakumaran of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 427, and 506(1) after finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key complainant (PW1) did not identify the accused at the occurrence, could not recall the date, and testified based on mere suspicion due to prior disagreement—contradicting the prosecution's case. Additionally, the eyewitness turned hostile, leaving only police documentary evidence insufficient to convict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
10-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
09-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
05-Feb-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
29-Jan-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
19-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
16-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
18-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
03-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
29-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
01-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
20-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
30-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
10-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
27-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
13-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
30-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
12-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
15-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
02-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
07-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
06-Feb-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
08-Jan-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
11-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
06-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No.2
-
02-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 772/2024
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Mayiladuthurai acquitted Balakumaran of all charges under IPC sections 294(b), 427, and 506(1) after finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key complainant (PW1) did not identify the accused at the occurrence, could not recall the date, and testified based on mere suspicion due to prior disagreement—contradicting the prosecution's case. Additionally, the eyewitness turned hostile, leaving only police documentary evidence insufficient to convict. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts