Inspector Of Police Manalmedu vs Thangadurai — 179/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY020032712025
e-Filing Number
07-08-2025
Filing Number
3268/2025
Filing Date
09-08-2025
Registration No
179/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Manalmedu
Respondent(s)
Thangadurai
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted the defendant of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 22 bottles of brandy were seized from the accused. The court held that the state's case suffered from critical gaps, including lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, failure to properly document the destruction of seized liquor as per legal procedures, and inconsistencies in the police witnesses' testimony regarding the date and location of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted the defendant of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that 22 bottles of brandy were seized from the accused. The court held that the state's case suffered from critical gaps, including lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, failure to properly document the destruction of seized liquor as per legal procedures, and inconsistencies in the police witnesses' testimony regarding the date and location of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts