Sivasakthi vs Karthik — 33/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNMY020030212025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-07-2025

Filing Number

3019/2025

Filing Date

29-07-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

07-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 Section 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22

Petitioner(s)

Sivasakthi

Adv. SENTHAMIL SELVAN S

Respondent(s)

Karthik

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

12-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

Orders

11-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

03-12-2025

Counter

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: 33/2025 - Sivasakthi v. Karthik The District Judge at Mayiladuthurai granted protection and maintenance relief to Sivasakthi under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that Karthik subjected Sivasakthi to physical, verbal, and psychological abuse after their marriage in 2018, abandoned her by falsely claiming she had a serious illness, and failed to provide maintenance. The court awarded: (1) protection order under Section 18; (2) ₹5,000/month rent assistance under Section 19; (3) recovery of jewelry and dowry items under Section 19(8); (4) ₹8,000/month maintenance under Section 20 (₹5,000 existing + ₹3,000 additional); and (5) ₹30,000 compensation under Section 22. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 33/2025 - Sivasakthi v. Karthik The District Judge at Mayiladuthurai granted protection and maintenance relief to Sivasakthi under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that Karthik subjected Sivasakthi to physical, verbal, and psychological abuse after their marriage in 2018, abandoned her by falsely claiming she had a serious illness, and failed to provide maintenance. The court awarded: (1) protection order under Section 18; (2) ₹5,000/month rent assistance under Section 19; (3) recovery of jewelry and dowry items under Section 19(8); (4) ₹8,000/month maintenance under Section 20 (₹5,000 existing + ₹3,000 additional); and (5) ₹30,000 compensation under Section 22. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case