Inspector of Police, PalaiyurPS vs SUDHAKAR ALIES SABARI Advocate - Thiru V.MUTHURAMAN — 624/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY020013952026

Filing Number

1384/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

624/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.2

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

Palaiyur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, PalaiyurPS

    Adv. Thiru V.MUTHURAMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHAKAR ALIES SABARI Advocate - Thiru V.MUTHURAMAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case 624/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sabari's bail petition filed under Section 480 BNSS for offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS 2023. The court found the accusations against the petitioner well-founded and the investigation pending, and declined bail considering the nature and severity of the offence despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.2

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 624/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 624/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sabari's bail petition filed under Section 480 BNSS for offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS 2023. The court found the accusations against the petitioner well-founded and the investigation pending, and declined bail considering the nature and severity of the offence despite the accused having been in judicial custody for 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case