Latha mageshwari vs Sivaprakasam — 34/2025

Case under Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY020013302025

Filing Number

1330/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

9-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Latha mageshwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sivaprakasam

  2. 2.Baskaran

  3. 3.Kalidoss

  4. 4.Chandrasekar

  5. 5.Nadarajan

  6. 6.Jothi

  7. 7.Kaveri

  8. 8.Kaliyaperumal

  9. 9.Mani

  10. 10.Venkatesan

  11. 11.Ramamoorthy

  12. 12.Baskaran

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case 34/2025 Summary Petitioner: Latha Mageshwari Respondents: Sivaprakasam, Baskaran, and Kalidoss Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai Date: 07.04.2026 The petition alleging criminal offenses under IPC Section 355 and related sections was examined. The court found merits in the petitioner's complaint regarding disputes over property and allegations of wrongful acts by the respondents. The court directed further investigation and ordered the respondents to appear before it. The matter has been adjourned for continued proceedings with directions for proper examination of evidence and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  12. 27-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Await Orders

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  15. 06-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  16. 30-Sep-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  19. 02-Sep-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  21. 19-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  22. 17-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  23. 01-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  24. 10-Jun-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  25. 27-May-2025

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  27. 21-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 34/2025 Summary Petitioner: Latha Mageshwari Respondents: Sivaprakasam, Baskaran, and Kalidoss Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai Date: 07.04.2026 The petition alleging criminal offenses under IPC Section 355 and related sections was examined. The court found merits in the petitioner's complaint regarding disputes over property and allegations of wrongful acts by the respondents. The court directed further investigation and ordered the respondents to appear before it. The matter has been adjourned for continued proceedings with directions for proper examination of evidence and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case