Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai vs Vinoth — 4/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,352,307,506(ii). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Trial Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY020002142026

Filing Number

211/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

9-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

Mayiladuthurai

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,352,307,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai

    Adv. Thiru.R.SEYON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinoth

  2. 2.Vimal

  3. 3.Parthipan

  4. 4.Babukannan

  5. 5.Suriyan

  6. 6.Chandhiran

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This Tamil Nadu court order (dated 26.03.2026) dismisses three criminal petitions (SC No. 4/2026). The petitioner sought relief in connection with charges under Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Act, 1948, alleging harassment and false accusations. The court found the allegations unsubstantiated and rejected all prayers in the petitions, upholding the investigation and charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This Tamil Nadu court order (dated 26.03.2026) dismisses three criminal petitions (SC No. 4/2026). The petitioner sought relief in connection with charges under Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Act, 1948, alleging harassment and false accusations. The court found the allegations unsubstantiated and rejected all prayers in the petitions, upholding the investigation and charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case