Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai vs Saranraj and 2 others Advocate - K.Santhoshkumar — 600003/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,323,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY020002042023

Filing Number

600040/2023

Filing Date

04-Jan-2023

Registration No

600003/2023

Registration Date

05-Jan-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,323,506(2)
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police, MayiladuthuraiSaranraj and 2 others
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police, MayiladuthuraiSaranraj and 2 others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai

    Adv. Tmt P.MALATHI, B.Sc.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saranraj and 2 others Advocate - K.Santhoshkumar

  2. 2.karthikeyan

  3. 3.karunagaran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 600003/2023 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Saranraj, Karthikeyan, and Karunakaaran) of charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, 323, and 506(ii), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key evidentiary inconsistencies—including conflicting timelines regarding when the alleged assault occurred, contradictory medical records about injury severity, and witness testimonies containing material variations—rendered the case evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  15. 14-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  16. 04-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  18. 28-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  19. 24-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  20. 30-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  21. 23-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  22. 12-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  23. 22-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  24. 01-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  25. 18-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  26. 18-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  27. 04-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  28. 17-Jun-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  29. 27-May-2025

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  30. 20-May-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  31. 20-May-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  32. 22-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  33. 21-Mar-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  34. 25-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  35. 31-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  36. 10-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  37. 17-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  38. 26-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  39. 25-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  40. 01-Oct-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  41. 01-Oct-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  42. 01-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  43. 27-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  44. 19-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  45. 25-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  46. 21-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  47. 23-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  48. 26-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  49. 13-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  50. 29-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  51. 24-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  52. 10-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  53. 25-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  54. 18-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  55. 09-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  56. 02-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  57. 24-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  58. 18-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  59. 13-Feb-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  60. 10-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 04-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 600003/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 600003/2023 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Saranraj, Karthikeyan, and Karunakaaran) of charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, 323, and 506(ii), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key evidentiary inconsistencies—including conflicting timelines regarding when the alleged assault occurred, contradictory medical records about injury severity, and witness testimonies containing material variations—rendered the case evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case