INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAYILADUTHURAI vs KEERTHIKARAN — 600161/2020

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(பி),324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMY020001002020

Filing Number

600652/2020

Filing Date

15-Sep-2020

Registration No

600161/2020

Registration Date

15-Sep-2020

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(பி),324,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAYILADUTHURAI

    Adv. Thiru. S. VEERAMANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KEERTHIKARAN

  2. 2.Sasikumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution's key witnesses—the complainant and eyewitnesses—turned hostile and gave conflicting testimony, while relying solely on the investigating officer's testimony was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  14. 07-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  18. 08-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  19. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  21. 23-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  22. 02-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  23. 01-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  24. 04-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  25. 14-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  27. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  28. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  29. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  30. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  31. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  32. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  33. 14-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  34. 10-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  35. 05-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  36. 12-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  37. 09-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  38. 12-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  39. 15-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  40. 28-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  41. 27-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  42. 22-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  43. 28-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  44. 20-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  45. 12-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  46. 31-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  47. 21-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  48. 06-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  49. 02-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  50. 24-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  51. 18-Oct-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  52. 06-Oct-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  53. 08-Sep-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  54. 25-Aug-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  55. 29-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  56. 14-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  57. 17-May-2022

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  58. 11-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  59. 25-Feb-2022

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  60. 22-Dec-2021

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  61. 29-Sep-2021

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  62. 12-Jul-2021

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  63. 26-Apr-2021

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  64. 10-Mar-2021

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  65. 16-Dec-2020

    Issues

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  66. 15-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 15-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 600161/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution's key witnesses—the complainant and eyewitnesses—turned hostile and gave conflicting testimony, while relying solely on the investigating officer's testimony was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case