The Inspector of Police,Myld vs Senthilkumar — 600020/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii),IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMY020000342019
Filing Number
600041/2019
Filing Date
18-Jan-2019
Registration No
600020/2019
Registration Date
18-Jan-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
846
Police Station
Mayiladuthurai
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police,Myld
Adv. Thiru A.JOTHIRATHNAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Senthilkumar
-
2.Elangovan
-
3.Kalyani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted three accused persons (Senthilkumar, Ilangkaaavan, and Kalyani) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) for allegedly assaulting and abusing a complainant on 14.12.2017. The court found that the complainant (PW1) and eye-witness (PW2) turned hostile and gave contradictory statements, while the third prosecution witness (PW3, an investigating officer) alone could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court discharged the accused persons under Section 248(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
09-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
23-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
27-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
09-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
05-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
14-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
14-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
16-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
19-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
11-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
02-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
23-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
14-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
18-Feb-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
31-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
22-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
19-Oct-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
21-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
15-Jun-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-May-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
05-Apr-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
15-Mar-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Feb-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
19-Jan-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
15-Dec-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
17-Nov-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Oct-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
12-Sep-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
04-Aug-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
04-Jul-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
02-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
28-Apr-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
04-Mar-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
18-Feb-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Feb-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Jan-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
02-Dec-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
08-Nov-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
11-Oct-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Sep-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
17-Aug-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
27-Jul-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Jul-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
05-Jul-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Jun-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
17-May-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
30-Mar-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
27-Jan-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
24-Nov-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
13-Oct-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
18-Aug-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
02-Jun-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
17-Mar-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Jan-2021
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
27-Nov-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
24-Sep-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
25-Jun-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
20-May-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
27-Feb-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
06-Jan-2020
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
04-Nov-2019
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
03-Oct-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
05-Aug-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
05-Jul-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
07-Jun-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
30-May-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
02-May-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
28-Feb-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
25-Feb-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.1
-
18-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 600020/2019
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mayiladuthurai acquitted three accused persons (Senthilkumar, Ilangkaaavan, and Kalyani) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(ii) for allegedly assaulting and abusing a complainant on 14.12.2017. The court found that the complainant (PW1) and eye-witness (PW2) turned hostile and gave contradictory statements, while the third prosecution witness (PW3, an investigating officer) alone could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court discharged the accused persons under Section 248(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts