Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai vs Chandramohan) — 220/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 120(b), 324, 326, 149, 307, 302. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY010040682024

Arguments

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3080/2024

Filing Date

09-07-2024

Registration No

220/2024

Registration Date

09-07-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 120(b), 324, 326, 149, 307, 302
ARMS ACT, 1959 Section 25(1)(b)
SC / ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai

Respondent(s)

Chandramohan)

Balaji

Sathish

Sriram

Chandramouli

Sathiyaseelan

Nagaraj

Ajithkumar

Mahavishnu alias Vasi

Mohandoss

Sathiyanathan(Permanently exempted)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

20-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

03-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

12-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary Case No.: 220/2024 | Court: Criminal Appeal | Date: 12.11.2025 The appellants' petition is dismissed. The court upheld the conviction under sections related to culpable homicide and other offenses, finding sufficient evidence against the accused. The sentence imposed by the lower court is affirmed, with the court rejecting arguments regarding insufficient evidence and procedural irregularities raised in the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case No.: 220/2024 | Court: Criminal Appeal | Date: 12.11.2025 The appellants' petition is dismissed. The court upheld the conviction under sections related to culpable homicide and other offenses, finding sufficient evidence against the accused. The sentence imposed by the lower court is affirmed, with the court rejecting arguments regarding insufficient evidence and procedural irregularities raised in the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case