MOHAMMED HAJI vs The Inspector of Police, Perambur — 40/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415&423. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNMY010040012024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3028/2024

Filing Date

18-11-2024

Registration No

40/2024

Registration Date

18-11-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

Police Station

Perambur Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415&423

Petitioner(s)

MOHAMMED HAJI

Adv. Thiru T. CHANDRASEKARAN

Respondent(s)

The Inspector of Police, Perambur

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

09-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

Judgement

02-03-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Reopen

12-02-2026

Reopen

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The District and Sessions Judge reversed the trial court's conviction of Mohamed Haaji for offences under IPC sections 294(b), 342, and 307, finding critical evidentiary gaps including unexplained 15-hour delay in FIR registration, absence of medical evidence for alleged injuries, and failure to examine key witnesses like the village counselor and the police officer who registered the case. The appellate court held the trial court's conviction lacked sufficient evidentiary basis and ordered acquittal with refund of any fine paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Sessions Judge reversed the trial court's conviction of Mohamed Haaji for offences under IPC sections 294(b), 342, and 307, finding critical evidentiary gaps including unexplained 15-hour delay in FIR registration, absence of medical evidence for alleged injuries, and failure to examine key witnesses like the village counselor and the police officer who registered the case. The appellate court held the trial court's conviction lacked sufficient evidentiary basis and ordered acquittal with refund of any fine paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case