R. JANANI SOUNDARYA vs Thiru. Mohamed Ali — 285/2023

Case under Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section 22(3). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Amendment Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNMY010025022023

Filing Number

703/2023

Filing Date

24-Jul-2023

Registration No

285/2023

Registration Date

25-Jul-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section 22(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.R. JANANI SOUNDARYA

Adv. R.SEYON
2.Jesima Fargana

Respondent(s)

1.Thiru. Mohamed Ali

Case History

18-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
21-Apr-2026

Amendment

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
16-Apr-2026

Amendment

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
10-Mar-2026

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
02-Mar-2026

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
04-Feb-2026

Orders

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
03-Feb-2026

Orders

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
13-Nov-2025

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
23-Oct-2025

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
16-Sep-2025

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
28-Jul-2025

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai allowed Jesima Farhana's petition to be impleaded as a claimant in land acquisition proceedings for survey No. 216/15, which was being acquired for the Chennai-Kanyakumari highway widening project. The court found that Farhana's claim of ownership, supported by a sale deed from 1989, was undisputed by both the respondent and the land acquisition officer, making her the rightful owner rather than Mohamed Ali in whose name the acquisition proceedings were initiated. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
28-Jul-2025

Steps

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
10-Jun-2025

Reopen

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
30-Apr-2025

Restored

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
30-Apr-2025

Reopen

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
30-Apr-2025

Reopen

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
30-Jul-2024

Disposed

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
16-Jul-2024

IA Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
20-Jun-2024

IA Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
04-Jun-2024

IA Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
16-Apr-2024

IA Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
25-Mar-2024

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
19-Mar-2024

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
15-Feb-2024

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
11-Jan-2024

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
08-Dec-2023

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
20-Oct-2023

Issue of Service

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
08-Sep-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Jul-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 285/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai allowed Jesima Farhana's petition to be impleaded as a claimant in land acquisition proceedings for survey No. 216/15, which was being acquired for the Chennai-Kanyakumari highway widening project. The court found that Farhana's claim of ownership, supported by a sale deed from 1989, was undisputed by both the respondent and the land acquisition officer, making her the rightful owner rather than Mohamed Ali in whose name the acquisition proceedings were initiated. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.