R. JANANI SOUNDARYA vs Thiru. Mohamed Ali — 285/2023

Case under Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section 22(3). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNMY010025022023

Amendment

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

703/2023

Filing Date

24-07-2023

Registration No

285/2023

Registration Date

25-07-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Acts & Sections

LandAcquisition(AmendmentandValidation)Act Section 22(3)

Petitioner(s)

R. JANANI SOUNDARYA

Adv. R.SEYON

Jesima Fargana

Respondent(s)

Thiru. Mohamed Ali

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

21-04-2026

Amendment

16-04-2026

Amendment

10-03-2026

Steps

02-03-2026

Steps

04-02-2026

Orders

Interim Orders

28-07-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai allowed Jesima Farhana's petition to be impleaded as a claimant in land acquisition proceedings for survey No. 216/15, which was being acquired for the Chennai-Kanyakumari highway widening project. The court found that Farhana's claim of ownership, supported by a sale deed from 1989, was undisputed by both the respondent and the land acquisition officer, making her the rightful owner rather than Mohamed Ali in whose name the acquisition proceedings were initiated. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Mayiladuthurai allowed Jesima Farhana's petition to be impleaded as a claimant in land acquisition proceedings for survey No. 216/15, which was being acquired for the Chennai-Kanyakumari highway widening project. The court found that Farhana's claim of ownership, supported by a sale deed from 1989, was undisputed by both the respondent and the land acquisition officer, making her the rightful owner rather than Mohamed Ali in whose name the acquisition proceedings were initiated. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case