Inspector of Police, Poraiyar PS vs Kamaladoss — 75/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 186,188,189. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMY010011052021

Part Heard

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

462/2019

Filing Date

18-06-2019

Registration No

75/2019

Registration Date

18-06-2019

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

FIR Details

FIR Number

335

Police Station

Poraiyar Police Station

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 186,188,189
PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY ACT, 1984 Section 3(1)
MP/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Inspector of Police, Poraiyar PSKamaladoss

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, Poraiyar PS (Police Station)

Adv. Thiru.R.SEYON

Respondent(s)

Kamaladoss

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

09-03-2026

Part Heard

19-01-2026

Part Heard

08-10-2025

Evidence

01-08-2025

Evidence

27-06-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

29-07-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document records the witness examination statement (not a court order) in Session Case No. 75/2019 from the District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai, dated 29.07.2024. Government witness 4 (LW 5), Annadurai, testified regarding a truck seizure incident from 11.11.2013, confirming his signatures on confessional and seizure documents; the opposing counsel was absent, so no cross-examination occurred. The witness's testimony was recorded and marked as Exhibit 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the witness examination statement (not a court order) in Session Case No. 75/2019 from the District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai, dated 29.07.2024. Government witness 4 (LW 5), Annadurai, testified regarding a truck seizure incident from 11.11.2013, confirming his signatures on confessional and seizure documents; the opposing counsel was absent, so no cross-examination occurred. The witness's testimony was recorded and marked as Exhibit 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case