S.SELVARAJ vs JATHANRAJA AND FOUR OTHERS Advocate - Thiru C. ARULTHAS — 28/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMY010010642024

Filing Number

218/2024

Filing Date

21-Mar-2024

Registration No

28/2024

Registration Date

12-Apr-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.SELVARAJ

    Adv. Thiru. K.M.SUBRAMANIAM,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JATHANRAJA AND FOUR OTHERS Advocate - Thiru C. ARULTHAS

  2. 2.District Superintendent Police, Mayiladuthurai

  3. 3.Tamil Nadu Director of Police

  4. 4.TamilNadu Home Secretary

  5. 5.Ravichandaran, Inspector of Police, Kuthalam P.s

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 28/2024 Court: District Court, Mayiladuthurai Date: 12.03.2026 Petitioner: S. Selvaraj Respondents: Jathanraja and four others The court examined the petitioner's claim for compensation against defendants 2-4. The court found that the first respondent's employment status and personal disputes with the petitioner are irrelevant to the case. The court noted a dismissed writ petition filed in the High Court. The case was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish that the first respondent is liable to pay compensation or that defendants 2-5 bear any responsibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  8. 23-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  12. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  13. 09-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  14. 12-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  15. 09-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  16. 28-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  17. 07-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  18. 17-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  19. 20-Sep-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  20. 12-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  22. 06-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  23. 24-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  24. 02-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  25. 11-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  26. 12-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 21-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 28/2024 Court: District Court, Mayiladuthurai Date: 12.03.2026 Petitioner: S. Selvaraj Respondents: Jathanraja and four others The court examined the petitioner's claim for compensation against defendants 2-4. The court found that the first respondent's employment status and personal disputes with the petitioner are irrelevant to the case. The court noted a dismissed writ petition filed in the High Court. The case was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish that the first respondent is liable to pay compensation or that defendants 2-5 bear any responsibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case