Dhanalakshmi vs Lingarajan — 47/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section SEC51A. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNMY010009472023
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
353/2023
Filing Date
30-03-2022
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanalakshmi
Adv. Thiru. R.BALAJI,
Respondent(s)
Lingarajan
Masilamani
B.Senthil
Ganasekaran
Manoharan
Radhakrishnan
Tamilnadu State Election Commissinor
District Election Commissner,District collector
Election conacting officer and Mucipalty officer
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 47/2023 Petitioner: Dhanalakshmi | Respondents: Lingarajan, Masilamani, B. Senthil Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court upheld the election of the first respondent (Lingarajan) as Ward Councilor, finding that he legitimately received 650 votes compared to the petitioner's one vote. The court found no procedural irregularities in the election process conducted on 19.02.2022 at Mayiladuthurai Municipality and determined that all statutory requirements were properly followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 47/2023 Petitioner: Dhanalakshmi | Respondents: Lingarajan, Masilamani, B. Senthil Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court upheld the election of the first respondent (Lingarajan) as Ward Councilor, finding that he legitimately received 650 votes compared to the petitioner's one vote. The court found no procedural irregularities in the election process conducted on 19.02.2022 at Mayiladuthurai Municipality and determined that all statutory requirements were properly followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts