ARASU vs The Inspector of police, Manalmedu — 365/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010006822026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
534/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
365/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
113
Police Station
Manalmedu Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARASU
Adv. Sekar Ramanujam
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of police, Manalmedu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case 365/2026 Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, dismissed Arasu's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. Arasu was charged under Section 123 BNS and Section 6 read with 24(1) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, for possessing 30 packets (600 grams) of banned HANS CHAAP TOBACCO with intent to sell from his grocery shop. The court found bail inappropriate given Arasu's 10 prior cases under similar provisions and the ongoing investigation, dismissing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
17-Mar-2026
Service Pending
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 365/2026
Case 365/2026 Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, dismissed Arasu's anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. Arasu was charged under Section 123 BNS and Section 6 read with 24(1) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, for possessing 30 packets (600 grams) of banned HANS CHAAP TOBACCO with intent to sell from his grocery shop. The court found bail inappropriate given Arasu's 10 prior cases under similar provisions and the ongoing investigation, dismissing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts