Citrarasan vs Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram — 348/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010006622026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

517/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Annaikaranchathiram P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Citrarasan

Adv. Rathakrishnan R

Respondent(s)

1.Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

The District and Sessions Judge at Mayiladuthurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Citrarasan under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage, the complainant sustained serious head injuries and remained hospitalized, and two co-accused had already been remanded to judicial custody, making pre-arrest bail premature and unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
12-Mar-2026

Service Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
11-Mar-2026

Service Pending

District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge at Mayiladuthurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Citrarasan under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023. The court found that the investigation was at a preliminary stage, the complainant sustained serious head injuries and remained hospitalized, and two co-accused had already been remanded to judicial custody, making pre-arrest bail premature and unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.