sivaprakash vs Inspector of Police, Sirkali — 343/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010006512026
Filing Number
507/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
343/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Sirkali Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.sivaprakash
Adv. Thiru.S.SANKARANARAYANAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Sirkali
-
2.Kathiravan
-
3.Vetriasan alias Vetrivendhan
Adv. Thiru.S.SANKARANARAYANAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai allowed the bail petition of three accused (A1, A3, A4) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) read with SC/ST Act provisions. The court granted bail on executing Rs. 25,000 bonds with two sureties each, considering that over 31 days had elapsed since case registration, major investigation was complete, injured persons were discharged, and a counter-case existed. Stringent conditions were imposed including daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 343/2026
Summary The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai allowed the bail petition of three accused (A1, A3, A4) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) read with SC/ST Act provisions. The court granted bail on executing Rs. 25,000 bonds with two sureties each, considering that over 31 days had elapsed since case registration, major investigation was complete, injured persons were discharged, and a counter-case existed. Stringent conditions were imposed including daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts