Ponmani vs Inspector of Police, PEW Police , Sirkali — 339/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010006432026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
501/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
339/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ponmani
Adv. RV.HARIHARAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, PEW Police , Sirkali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Ponmani Rajendran, accused of transporting illegal liquor (110 liters of arrack and 480 bottles of brandy) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act and Transport Act. The court held that as the vehicle owner and prime accused in a prohibition offense case, she was not entitled to anticipatory bail, noting that one co-accused was already arrested and others remain absconding with investigation ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
09-Mar-2026
Service Pending
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 339/2026
The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Ponmani Rajendran, accused of transporting illegal liquor (110 liters of arrack and 480 bottles of brandy) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act and Transport Act. The court held that as the vehicle owner and prime accused in a prohibition offense case, she was not entitled to anticipatory bail, noting that one co-accused was already arrested and others remain absconding with investigation ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts