PAVUNRAJ vs Inspector of Police, Kuthlam — 347/2026

Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010006412026

Filing Number

499/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

347/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

Kuthalam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAVUNRAJ

    Adv. BOOBALAN B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kuthlam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District and Sessions Judge at Mayiladuthurai granted bail to the accused Povunraj in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 75(1)(i), and 351(2) for alleged trespass and sexual abuse. The court found that the petitioner was not absconding, had been in custody for 48 days, and no serious injury was reported, thus allowing bail on conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 347/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge at Mayiladuthurai granted bail to the accused Povunraj in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 296(b), 75(1)(i), and 351(2) for alleged trespass and sexual abuse. The court found that the petitioner was not absconding, had been in custody for 48 days, and no serious injury was reported, thus allowing bail on conditions including daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case