MURUGAVEL vs Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu — 336/2026

Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010006172026

Filing Number

484/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

336/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Thiruvenkadu Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURUGAVEL

    Adv. Thiru. T.KARUNANITHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District and Sessions Judge granted bail to Murugavel, who was arrested under Section 326(g) BNS for allegedly setting fire to a house causing Rs. 20,000 in damages. The court considered that the petitioner had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for 10 days, and the property damage was relatively minor. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of Rs. 20,000 to the case credit, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibition against absconding, tampering with evidence, or threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge granted bail to Murugavel, who was arrested under Section 326(g) BNS for allegedly setting fire to a house causing Rs. 20,000 in damages. The court considered that the petitioner had no prior criminal record, had been in custody for 10 days, and the property damage was relatively minor. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, deposit of Rs. 20,000 to the case credit, daily police reporting for 30 days, and prohibition against absconding, tampering with evidence, or threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case