SIVAKUMAR vs Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram — 335/2026

Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010006142026

Case disposed

Filing Number

481/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

335/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

Annaikaranchathiram P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SIVAKUMAR

Adv. Thiru V.MUTHURAMAN

Murugan

Karthiyamurthi

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Service Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai granted bail to three accused (Sivakumar, Murugan, and Karthiyamoorthy) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting a person with an Aruval. The court found that while accused A1 had prior criminal history, A2 and A3 had no previous cases, and the accused had spent 20 days in custody with the injured person already discharged from hospital, justifying conditional bail. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai granted bail to three accused (Sivakumar, Murugan, and Karthiyamoorthy) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting a person with an Aruval. The court found that while accused A1 had prior criminal history, A2 and A3 had no previous cases, and the accused had spent 20 days in custody with the injured person already discharged from hospital, justifying conditional bail. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case