SIVAKUMAR vs Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram — 335/2026
Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010006142026
Filing Number
481/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
335/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
Annaikaranchathiram P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SIVAKUMAR
Adv. Thiru V.MUTHURAMAN
-
2.Murugan
-
3.Karthiyamurthi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Aanaikkaranchathiram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai granted bail to three accused (Sivakumar, Murugan, and Karthiyamoorthy) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting a person with an Aruval. The court found that while accused A1 had prior criminal history, A2 and A3 had no previous cases, and the accused had spent 20 days in custody with the injured person already discharged from hospital, justifying conditional bail. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 335/2026
The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai granted bail to three accused (Sivakumar, Murugan, and Karthiyamoorthy) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting a person with an Aruval. The court found that while accused A1 had prior criminal history, A2 and A3 had no previous cases, and the accused had spent 20 days in custody with the injured person already discharged from hospital, justifying conditional bail. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation in investigation, and prohibition against absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts