Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Poombukar — 312/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010005932026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

465/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

312/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

363

Police Station

Poompuhar Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Balamurugan

Adv. Thiru.R.RATHAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Poombukar

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Service Pending

06-03-2026

Service Pending

05-03-2026

Service Pending

03-03-2026

Service Pending

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, granted bail to Balamurugan in a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS, 2023, for offenses under Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS and 25(1A) Arms Act (extortion and criminal intimidation). The court considered that the petitioner had spent 77 days in judicial custody and the Goondas Act detention against him was revoked, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about pending investigation and prior criminal cases. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including execution of Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, granted bail to Balamurugan in a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS, 2023, for offenses under Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS and 25(1A) Arms Act (extortion and criminal intimidation). The court considered that the petitioner had spent 77 days in judicial custody and the Goondas Act detention against him was revoked, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about pending investigation and prior criminal cases. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including execution of Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case