Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Poombukar — 312/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMY010005932026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
465/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
312/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
Poompuhar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balamurugan
Adv. Thiru.R.RATHAKRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Poombukar
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Disposed
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 06-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 05-03-2026 | Service Pending | |
| 03-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, granted bail to Balamurugan in a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS, 2023, for offenses under Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS and 25(1A) Arms Act (extortion and criminal intimidation). The court considered that the petitioner had spent 77 days in judicial custody and the Goondas Act detention against him was revoked, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about pending investigation and prior criminal cases. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including execution of Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai, granted bail to Balamurugan in a second bail application under Section 483 BNSS, 2023, for offenses under Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS and 25(1A) Arms Act (extortion and criminal intimidation). The court considered that the petitioner had spent 77 days in judicial custody and the Goondas Act detention against him was revoked, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about pending investigation and prior criminal cases. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including execution of Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts