The Inspector of police, Manalmedu vs Vinoth Vellapallam Vinoth — 210/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),133,351(3)BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMY010004192026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

323/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

210/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai

Judge

8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),133,351(3)BNS
ARMS ACT, 1959 Section 25(1-C)ArmsAct

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of police, Manalmedu

Adv. MARIMUTHU A

Respondent(s)

Vinoth Vellapallam Vinoth

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Orders

10-03-2026

Orders

09-03-2026

Counter

06-03-2026

Counter

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The District and Sessions Judge dismissed the police petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to respondent Vinoth, finding that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence from the Kumbakonam West Police Station to prove non-compliance with the court's direction to appear daily for signing. The court held that bail cancellation, being a direct invasion of personal liberty, requires strong proof and cannot be based on mere allegations without written documentation from the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Sessions Judge dismissed the police petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to respondent Vinoth, finding that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence from the Kumbakonam West Police Station to prove non-compliance with the court's direction to appear daily for signing. The court held that bail cancellation, being a direct invasion of personal liberty, requires strong proof and cannot be based on mere allegations without written documentation from the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case