The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu P.S vs Varatharaja — 16/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMY010001812021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
77/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
Manalmedu Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, Manalmedu P.S
Adv. Thiru. R.PARAMANANDAM P P
Respondent(s)
Varatharaja
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-10-2025 | Evidence | |
| 10-09-2025 | Evidence | |
| 02-07-2025 | Evidence | |
| 02-06-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: A.S.1/16/2021, Additional District Court, Mayiladuthurai Date: 08.02.2023 The petitioner's daughter suffered severe burn injuries on 18.12.2019 after the two respondents poured kerosene on her and set her on fire during a domestic dispute. The victim was hospitalized and subsequently died from her injuries. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and the facts substantiated. The petition is allowed, and charges against the respondents are upheld based on evidence of criminal intimidation, causing grievous hurt, and related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: A.S.1/16/2021, Additional District Court, Mayiladuthurai Date: 08.02.2023 The petitioner's daughter suffered severe burn injuries on 18.12.2019 after the two respondents poured kerosene on her and set her on fire during a domestic dispute. The victim was hospitalized and subsequently died from her injuries. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and the facts substantiated. The petition is allowed, and charges against the respondents are upheld based on evidence of criminal intimidation, causing grievous hurt, and related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts