Seetharaman vs Ganesan — 4/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7 1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMY010000442022
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
20/2022
Filing Date
19-01-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
19-01-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai
Judge
8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seetharaman
Adv. S. Balasubramanian
Respondent(s)
Ganesan
Banumathi
Raguraman
Muthuraman
Prema
Chamundeeswari
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from OS.No. 04/2022 C/w 45/2023 & 46/2023 dated 27.11.2025. The document records the examination and cross-examination of the plaintiff (Seetharaman) and defendant (Ganesan) regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff authorized the defendant to purchase property on 25.06.2004 (Exhibit 45), and the defendant filed a counter-claim on 19.08.2021 (Exhibit 46). The core dispute involves whether properties were purchased in the plaintiff's name or the defendant's name, with the defendant claiming he was overseas for 16 years and later discovered the unauthorized purchases. The case appears to remain under examination with testimony being recorded, but no final order or judgment is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from OS.No. 04/2022 C/w 45/2023 & 46/2023 dated 27.11.2025. The document records the examination and cross-examination of the plaintiff (Seetharaman) and defendant (Ganesan) regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff authorized the defendant to purchase property on 25.06.2004 (Exhibit 45), and the defendant filed a counter-claim on 19.08.2021 (Exhibit 46). The core dispute involves whether properties were purchased in the plaintiff's name or the defendant's name, with the defendant claiming he was overseas for 16 years and later discovered the unauthorized purchases. The case appears to remain under examination with testimony being recorded, but no final order or judgment is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts