Archunan vs P.Lakshmanan and another — 386/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33(i). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD240005512023
Filing Number
537/2023
Filing Date
27-Sep-2023
Registration No
386/2023
Registration Date
27-Sep-2023
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Archunan
Adv. Tr.O.Gandhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.Lakshmanan and another
-
2.L.Pandiammal
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
21-Apr-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
20-Feb-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
21-Jan-2026
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
19-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
22-Oct-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
10-Sep-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
30-Jul-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
29-Jul-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
25-Jul-2025
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
24-Jul-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
30-Jun-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
In OS No. 386/2023 dated 30.06.2025, the court heard testimony from petitioner Archunan (P.W.1) regarding a dispute arising from an agreement dated 27.09.2017. Archunan alleged that the second respondent received Rs. 90,000 but failed to provide proper documentation, and that complaints lodged on 08.01.2024 and 09.01.2024 were not adequately addressed. The court found merit in certain aspects of the petitioner's claims but appears to have required further clarification on disputed documentary evidence before rendering a final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
13-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
05-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
07-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
28-Mar-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
17-Mar-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
08-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
20-Feb-2025
Lok Adalat
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
07-Feb-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
09-Dec-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
22-Oct-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Aug-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
25-Jun-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
22-Mar-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
21-Feb-2024
Issues
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
19-Feb-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
05-Feb-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
23-Jan-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
06-Jan-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
06-Jan-2024
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
09-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 386/2023
In OS No. 386/2023 dated 30.06.2025, the court heard testimony from petitioner Archunan (P.W.1) regarding a dispute arising from an agreement dated 27.09.2017. Archunan alleged that the second respondent received Rs. 90,000 but failed to provide proper documentation, and that complaints lodged on 08.01.2024 and 09.01.2024 were not adequately addressed. The court found merit in certain aspects of the petitioner's claims but appears to have required further clarification on disputed documentary evidence before rendering a final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts