Manimekalai vs Veeranan and another — 228/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD240004322022

Filing Number

419/2022

Filing Date

17-Nov-2022

Registration No

228/2022

Registration Date

17-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Usilampatti

Judge

3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manimekalai

    Adv. Tr.S.Ganapathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Veeranan and another

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 228/2022 - Manimekalai v. Veeranan The court ruled that plaintiff Manimekalai is entitled to a 1/3 share in the suit properties (Schedules A and B), with the other 1/3 shares going to respondents Veeranan and Chinna Veeramma respectively. The court found that the ancestral properties belonged to the plaintiff's parents and constitute joint family property, rejecting the respondent's claim of oral gift. Regarding Schedule C property (gold items), the court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for lack of evidence. The court granted a decree for partition and permanent injunction restraining respondents from interfering with the plaintiff's share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  17. 18-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  18. 17-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  19. 08-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  20. 26-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  21. 11-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  22. 10-Mar-2025

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  23. 25-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  25. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  26. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  27. 06-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  28. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  29. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  30. 20-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  31. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  32. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  33. 16-Dec-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  34. 13-Dec-2024

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  35. 11-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  36. 07-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  37. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  38. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  39. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  40. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  41. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  42. 30-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  43. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  44. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  45. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  46. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  47. 06-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  48. 26-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  49. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  50. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  51. 11-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  52. 03-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  53. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  54. 26-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  55. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  56. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  57. 26-Feb-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  58. 26-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  59. 02-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  60. 01-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  61. 19-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  62. 22-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  63. 22-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  64. 15-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  65. 24-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  66. 19-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 17-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 228/2022 - Manimekalai v. Veeranan The court ruled that plaintiff Manimekalai is entitled to a 1/3 share in the suit properties (Schedules A and B), with the other 1/3 shares going to respondents Veeranan and Chinna Veeramma respectively. The court found that the ancestral properties belonged to the plaintiff's parents and constitute joint family property, rejecting the respondent's claim of oral gift. Regarding Schedule C property (gold items), the court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for lack of evidence. The court granted a decree for partition and permanent injunction restraining respondents from interfering with the plaintiff's share. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case