A.Raman vs Late.A.Chokkalingam and 5 others — 18/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a), 27(c),52. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNMD240003502025

Filing Number

344/2025

Filing Date

08-Aug-2025

Registration No

18/2025

Registration Date

08-Aug-2025

Court

Sub Court, Usilampatti

Judge

3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a), 27(c),52

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.Raman

    Adv. DHANAPANDIAN M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Late.A.Chokkalingam and 5 others

  2. 2.C.Chinnan

  3. 3.Alagammal

  4. 4.Maruthi

  5. 5.Alagu

  6. 6.Lakshmi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Sub Judge dismissed A.Raman's appeal against the 2011 District Munsif judgment for default, as the appellant failed to appear in court on 6 April 2026 and proceedings for Respondent 3 remained pending for an extended period. The original decree and judgment in O.S. No. 11/2005 thus remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Judge dismissed A.Raman's appeal against the 2011 District Munsif judgment for default, as the appellant failed to appear in court on 6 April 2026 and proceedings for Respondent 3 remained pending for an extended period. The original decree and judgment in O.S. No. 11/2005 thus remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case