S.Ra.Vijay Prabhaakar vs J. Kalaiselvan — 159/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 42(a), 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD240002962022
Filing Number
286/2022
Filing Date
18-08-2022
Registration No
159/2022
Registration Date
18-08-2022
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Ra.Vijay Prabhaakar
Adv. A.C.Balachandran
Respondent(s)
J. Kalaiselvan
S. Thangamalar
The Sub Registrar
The District Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Court in Usilampatti ruled in favor of petitioner S. Ra. Vijay Prabhaakar in a property dispute case. The court ordered Respondent 1 (J. Kalaiselvan) to receive the outstanding purchase amount of ₹1,27,000 from the petitioner and register the property deed in the petitioner's name within one month, or allow the court to process the registration. The court also mandated that Respondent 2's (S. Thangamalar's) fraudulent sale deed be cancelled by the Sub-Registrar and District Registrar, finding that the respondents breached an earlier sale agreement dated 23.06.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Court in Usilampatti ruled in favor of petitioner S. Ra. Vijay Prabhaakar in a property dispute case. The court ordered Respondent 1 (J. Kalaiselvan) to receive the outstanding purchase amount of ₹1,27,000 from the petitioner and register the property deed in the petitioner's name within one month, or allow the court to process the registration. The court also mandated that Respondent 2's (S. Thangamalar's) fraudulent sale deed be cancelled by the Sub-Registrar and District Registrar, finding that the respondents breached an earlier sale agreement dated 23.06.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts