M.Edwin fredy vs P.Niranjan and one another — 135/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 33. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD240002722024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
264/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
135/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Edwin fredy
Adv. Tr.S.Whitekennady
Respondent(s)
P.Niranjan and one another
P.Nithya
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 135/2024 Summary This is a civil suit (O.S. 135/2024) heard in the Sub Court, Usilampatti on 02.06.2026. The document contains witness testimony (PW2) regarding a monetary dispute allegedly involving respondent P. Niranjan and others. The witness testified about property transactions, loan disputes, and claims that Rs. 5 lakhs were involved in contested circumstances between the parties. The court examined the credibility of evidence including property documents, loan records dated 11.12.2020, and competing claims about money transfers and possession of assets. The judgment reflects the court's assessment of conflicting testimonies regarding liability and the legitimacy of financial transactions between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 135/2024 Summary This is a civil suit (O.S. 135/2024) heard in the Sub Court, Usilampatti on 02.06.2026. The document contains witness testimony (PW2) regarding a monetary dispute allegedly involving respondent P. Niranjan and others. The witness testified about property transactions, loan disputes, and claims that Rs. 5 lakhs were involved in contested circumstances between the parties. The court examined the credibility of evidence including property documents, loan records dated 11.12.2020, and competing claims about money transfers and possession of assets. The judgment reflects the court's assessment of conflicting testimonies regarding liability and the legitimacy of financial transactions between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts