Annathai and 2 others vs Pappu and 3 others — 16/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNMD240002552025
Filing Number
251/2025
Filing Date
27-Jun-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
27-Jun-2025
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Annathai and 2 others
Adv. SELVARAJ P
-
2.Selvam
-
3.Mahalakshmi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pappu and 3 others
-
2.Karuppu
-
3.Thangapandi
-
4.Deivam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Appellate Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's suit regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately prove peaceful possession of the contested land portion and that the trial court properly rejected the claim for a permanent injunction against the defendants' alleged trespass and obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
05-Mar-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
17-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
13-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
15-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
05-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
27-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2025
Court Decision Summary The Appellate Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's suit regarding disputed property ownership. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately prove peaceful possession of the contested land portion and that the trial court properly rejected the claim for a permanent injunction against the defendants' alleged trespass and obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts