Raman @ Ramasamy vs Chinnaraman and another — 58/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNMD240001052019

Filing Number

105/2019

Filing Date

06-Jun-2019

Registration No

58/2019

Registration Date

06-Jun-2019

Court

Sub Court, Usilampatti

Judge

3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raman @ Ramasamy

    Adv. Tr.A.C. Balachandran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chinnaraman and another

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case 58/2019 Summary Raman @ Ramasamy v. Chinnaraman and others The court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging a 2015 trial court judgment concerning disputed property rights. The trial court had partially granted relief on certain property parcels (items 1-4) but dismissed claims regarding item 5, finding the appellant lacked joint ownership rights to that particular property. The appellate court upheld this decision, determining the appellant had failed to prove common enjoyment or co-ownership of the disputed land parcel and thus was not entitled to the injunction sought against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  11. 16-Jul-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  13. 28-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  14. 08-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  16. 20-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  17. 20-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  19. 09-Jan-2025

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  20. 05-Dec-2024

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  21. 25-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  22. 04-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  23. 25-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  24. 20-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  25. 05-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  26. 19-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  27. 05-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  28. 22-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  29. 27-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  30. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  31. 12-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  32. 28-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  33. 07-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  34. 05-Dec-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  35. 31-Oct-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  36. 25-Sep-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  37. 09-Aug-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  38. 12-Jun-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  39. 20-Mar-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  40. 24-Jan-2023

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  41. 08-Dec-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  42. 27-Sep-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  43. 12-Jul-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  44. 06-Jun-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  45. 15-Mar-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  46. 10-Feb-2022

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  47. 20-Dec-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  48. 07-Dec-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  49. 27-Oct-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  50. 23-Sep-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  51. 18-Aug-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  52. 06-Jul-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  53. 02-Jun-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  54. 31-Mar-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  55. 03-Mar-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  56. 22-Jan-2021

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  57. 25-Nov-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  58. 12-Oct-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  59. 02-Sep-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  60. 15-Jul-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  61. 12-Jun-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  62. 03-Jun-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  63. 19-Mar-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  64. 09-Jan-2020

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  65. 30-Oct-2019

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  66. 29-Aug-2019

    Await Records

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  67. 11-Jun-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 06-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case 58/2019 Summary Raman @ Ramasamy v. Chinnaraman and others The court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging a 2015 trial court judgment concerning disputed property rights. The trial court had partially granted relief on certain property parcels (items 1-4) but dismissed claims regarding item 5, finding the appellant lacked joint ownership rights to that particular property. The appellate court upheld this decision, determining the appellant had failed to prove common enjoyment or co-ownership of the disputed land parcel and thus was not entitled to the injunction sought against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case